Electron-based terminal built on web technologies with plugin support.
▲ 12
Visit →
Hyper vs iTerm2
Comparing Hyper and iTerm2 to help you pick the right Terminal Apps for your needs.
| Feature | Hyper | iTerm2 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Open Source | Open Source |
| Platforms | macOS, Windows, Linux | macOS |
| Editorial rating | ★ 3.9 / 5 | ★ 4.3 / 5 |
| Starting price | $0 | $0 |
| Community votes | 12 | 20 |
Hyper Pros & Cons
- Cross-platform — available on Mac, Windows, and Linux
- Plugin ecosystem enables extensive customization
- Web technologies make it hackable for developers who want control
- Clean, modern default appearance
- Electron-based means higher memory usage than native alternatives
- Performance slower than native terminal emulators
- Less feature-complete than iTerm2 for macOS power users
iTerm2 Pros & Cons
- Split panes enable multiple terminals in one window
- Shell integration shows current directory in title and marks command output
- Search across terminal output for quickly finding past commands
- Trigger system for responding to text patterns with actions
- macOS only — not available on Windows or Linux
- Large feature set can be overwhelming for users wanting simple terminal
- No AI features unlike Warp
Verdict: Hyper vs iTerm2
Hyper and iTerm2 both serve the Terminal Apps category well, but suit different priorities. iTerm2 carries the stronger editorial rating (4.3 / 5), Hyper supports more platforms (3 vs 1). Based on community engagement, iTerm2 is currently the more widely adopted choice (20 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which is cheaper, Hyper or iTerm2?
- Hyper and iTerm2 use a similar pricing model (both open-source), so the cheaper choice depends on which specific plan tier and feature set you need rather than the base pricing model.
- Is Hyper or iTerm2 rated higher?
- iTerm2 has the higher editorial rating at 4.3 out of 5, compared to Hyper's 3.9 out of 5. This is Kreemhunt's own staff rating, not a public user aggregate — review the pros and cons below for specifics that matter to your use case.
- Which platforms do Hyper and iTerm2 support?
- Hyper is available on macOS, Windows, Linux. iTerm2 is available on macOS. Hyper covers more platforms overall, which matters if your team works across a wider range of devices and operating systems.
- Can I switch from Hyper to iTerm2 (or vice versa)?
- Most terminal apps tools, including Hyper and iTerm2, support data export in standard formats, making migration possible though rarely fully automatic. Expect to manually verify that custom configurations, integrations, and historical data transfer correctly, and budget time for the team to adjust to workflow differences between the two products.
- Should I choose Hyper or iTerm2?
- Hyper and iTerm2 both serve the Terminal Apps category well, but suit different priorities. iTerm2 carries the stronger editorial rating (4.3 / 5), Hyper supports more platforms (3 vs 1). Based on community engagement, iTerm2 is currently the more widely adopted choice (20 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.