Open-source JavaScript tour library for guiding users through product features.
▲ 10
Visit →
Shepherd.js vs Driver.js
Comparing Shepherd.js and Driver.js to help you pick the right Product Tour & Onboarding Tools for your needs.
| Feature | Shepherd.js | Driver.js |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Open Source | Open Source |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Editorial rating | ★ 4 / 5 | ★ 4 / 5 |
| Starting price | $0 | $0 |
| Community votes | 10 | 10 |
Shepherd.js Pros & Cons
- MIT licensed — fully free including commercial use
- Actively maintained with modern JavaScript support
- Better accessibility than Intro.js for screen reader compatibility
- Floating.js integration for accurate tooltip positioning
- Developer implementation required
- More complex API than Intro.js for simple tours
- Less documentation and examples than Intro.js community
Driver.js Pros & Cons
- No dependencies — zero added bundle weight beyond the library itself
- Clean element highlighting with overlay for feature spotlighting
- Simple API for quick feature announcements
- MIT licensed and actively maintained
- Less feature-rich than Intro.js or Shepherd for multi-step tours
- Smaller community than established alternatives
- Less suitable for comprehensive onboarding flows
Verdict: Shepherd.js vs Driver.js
Shepherd.js and Driver.js both serve the Product Tour & Onboarding Tools category well, but suit different priorities. Based on community engagement, Shepherd.js is currently the more widely adopted choice (10 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which is cheaper, Shepherd.js or Driver.js?
- Shepherd.js and Driver.js use a similar pricing model (both open-source), so the cheaper choice depends on which specific plan tier and feature set you need rather than the base pricing model.
- Is Shepherd.js or Driver.js rated higher?
- Shepherd.js and Driver.js currently hold comparable editorial ratings, so neither has a clear edge — the right pick depends more on which specific features and pricing fit your use case.
- Which platforms do Shepherd.js and Driver.js support?
- Shepherd.js is available on Web. Driver.js is available on Web. Both tools cover a similar range of platforms.
- Can I switch from Shepherd.js to Driver.js (or vice versa)?
- Most product tour & onboarding tools tools, including Shepherd.js and Driver.js, support data export in standard formats, making migration possible though rarely fully automatic. Expect to manually verify that custom configurations, integrations, and historical data transfer correctly, and budget time for the team to adjust to workflow differences between the two products.
- Should I choose Shepherd.js or Driver.js?
- Shepherd.js and Driver.js both serve the Product Tour & Onboarding Tools category well, but suit different priorities. Based on community engagement, Shepherd.js is currently the more widely adopted choice (10 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.